- 701 Fifth Avenue, Suite 4850
Seattle, WA 98104
P : 206-447-0182
F : 206-622-9927
email: info@davisgrimmpayne.com
Tag Archives: Reasonable Accommodation
Federal Judge Dismisses EEOC Case Based on Lack of Details in Complaint
Recently, a federal judge in the District of Columbia dismissed an Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (“EEOC”) lawsuit against Walmart on procedural grounds relating to the level of detail required in a complaint. This case serves as a reminder of the the necessary elements for a reasonable accommodation claim. In this case, two employees with hearing limitations alleged that the managers at the Walmart store where they worked failed to accommodate their disability. The two employees had sought sign language interpretation … Continue reading
Posted in ADA, EEOC, Reasonable Accommodation
Tagged ADA, EEOC, Motion to Dismiss, Pleading, Reasonable Accommodation
Leave a comment
ADA Reasonable Accommodations Seminar – Best Practices for Employers to Avoid Liability
May 5, 2016 · 10:00-11:30 a.m. · Columbia Center, Seattle
Employment law can be complicated, especially regarding the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) and the Family and Medical Leave Act (FMLA). To help employers minimize their risk of liability, labor and employment law attorney Selena Smith is partnering with the Association of Washington Business to host a seminar on May 5. Selena Smith will discuss employers’ legal obligations and rights, as well as best practices for addressing employees’ disabilities. Attendees will learn: Legal Obligations Regarding Reasonable Accommodations Effective Strategies for … Continue reading
Posted in ADA, Firm News, FMLA, Reasonable Accommodation, Seattle, Seminar
Tagged ADA, Association of Washington Business, FMLA, Reasonable Accommodation, Seminar
Leave a comment
SUPREME COURT SIDES WITH THE EEOC AGAINST ABERCROMBIE & FITCH IN HIRING PRACTICE CASE ADDRESSING RELIGIOUS DISCRIMINATION
The Supreme Court issued a controversial decision which should prompt Employers to review their hiring practices and criteria. In the recent EEOC v. Abercrombie & Fitch case, the Supreme Court ruled that Abercrombie & Fitch discriminated against Samantha Elauf (“Elauf”) based on her religious practice of wearing a headscarf. Elauf, a Muslim, wore her headscarf to her Abercrombie & Fitch job interview. During the interview, neither Elauf nor Abercrombie & Fitch representatives discussed her religion or her headscarf. However, after … Continue reading